August 6: the count of monte christo

I am a high-brow reader. Not very high-brow in many other aspects of my life, as you may have gathered. But I rarely read a piece of popular fiction. Maybe for reasons of snobbery or maybe because I don’t like to be drawn through the sensibility gutter. Too much of that, which is unavoidable, happens in everyday life. However, I find myself reading Le conte de Monte Christo by Alexandre Dumas pere. It is 1500 pages and I’ve got 150 left. It can’t be bad to have pulled me through. The plot is terrific. A man unjustifiably put in a prison on a deserted island off the coast of Marseille and left to rot. Another prisoner connects with him, having scratched his way through the dirt for years. This remarkable man teaches Edmond (our hero) everything he knows: languages; style; learning of all sorts. He dies and Edmond substitutes himself for the corpse and is thrown into the sea from which he escapes. A hoard of treasure on the island of Monte Christo had been revealed to him by his former prison-mate. Edmond finds it and becomes inestimably rich. He spends years on the sea, honing his life skills and then heads for Paris to revenge the four men who betrayed him. He kills them off one by one.

The problem is that the character of Edmond Dantes is an absolute; totally inhuman. He is so clever and refined and rich; he is a kind of superhero. His revenge is thoughtless. It ruins the family and children of all the betrayers; people who are innocent. Dumas does not see that his character is a problem. He could have examined the nature of absolute revenge in this long book, but that doesn’t interest him. Unfortunately the novel remains on the level of a teenage fantasy. Still, it’s a good yarn and has been adapted for the cinema many times, each time taking out scenes where Edmond is particulaly unpleasant, as well as skirting round moments where the ethics of 1842 do not match ours (less of an issue for me; sometimes they show up the sham of some of our ethics).

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com

July 31: eating asparagus incorrectly

A scene from many decades ago was called to mind yesterday. I was a young man living in Paris and invited to dinner or maybe Sunday lunch by a middle-aged woman I worked with. I was introduced to her family: two teen-aged daughters and the husband. Asparagus was served. I had never eaten asparagus before and didn’t know which ends to eat. After a minute ot two I heard the husband say about me ‘he is eating the asparagus in an incorrect way’ (‘il mange mal les asperges’) refering to me in the the third person as if I wasn’t there. He would have known that I spoke French. This was rather humiliating for me and very unpleasant behaviour on his part. When I recalled the incident yesterday I was furious at his behaviour even though the incident went back almost four decades. In my mind I have been trying to find responses to his unpleasantness that I should have produced at the time. I would say ‘Et vous , Monsieur, vous utilisez mal la troisieme personne’ (And you, sir, are using the third person in an incorrect way’). That would tell him. And then, having thrown my napkin down on the tablecloth, I would storm out.

There is such a lot of etiquette and protocol involved with the A vegetables (aubergine, asparagus and artichoke), so the rebuke cuts deep. It is like saying, you are an uncivilised barbarian. Brought up on Mancunian vegetables, and all being relative, my table manners with carrots and turnips are, of course, unimpeachable.

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com

July 16: punishment for austerity

I don’t drink much wine these days. There was a time I used to buy pretty good bottles from a fancy wine dealer and put them in a couple of wine racks in my living room. Gradually, I have drunk less wine. Nowadays, I may have a glass or two of wine four or five times a year. On holiday, when friends offer me a glass or two, or when I’ve bought some nice cheese from the expensive cheese shop. In France, wine still figures. If you don’t order wine in a restaurant the waiters whip away all your nicely laid out glasses as if to punish you for the austerity of your tastes. There is an implicit irritation that you are not doing what you are supposed to. Part of this is that it is in the drinks that their margins lie and if you aren’t partaking, they aren’t making a profit out of you. I remember a few years ago the story of an Air France flight where an American passenger wanted milk with his steak and the stewards refused. . I don’t know if that would happen today. Still, the atmosphere of seething resentment remains when you don’t order a bottle of bourgogne with your meal. If they really want you to drink the wine, they should look at their mark-ups.

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com

May 1: a game at tennis

When you are an aficianado of tennis style and you take pride in the elegant lines you make as you reach for a distant forehand, displaying the gleaming white and crisp cut of your Lacoste shirt, when you lovingly caress the topspin on your whipped crosscourt forehand and mop your brow with a tailored wrist cuff, when you are this kind of person, it is with some distaste that you play an opponent who doesn’t really consider his outfit, who pats his service over the net, instead of winging it across in a fierce trajectory. You have seen how the champions bounce the ball three times before commiting to a first serve, how they tap the sand from their tennis shoe, how they scoop the ball up to their open palm with one deft trick of the racket, whereas your opponent just waits there on the other side of the net, flat-footed and impassive, as though waiting for a bus, and just prods it back in an ignominious and shapeless arc, though, when he gets the chance, he wallops it.. And then you get home after the match and have to admit to your fiancee, who has already lovingly prepared your dry martini, that you humiliatingly lost to you lacklustre opponent. Your fiancee can hardly believe it. She is confused. She is livid. She sees you in a new light. But, she almost says, he was wearing denim shorts. You are not the man she thought you were, and maybe, this is not the world she thought it was. Now she even eyes her martini with distrust.

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com

April 25: stuck at bow street

After a bit, conversations with my olde dad, who had some form of dementia, were always the same conversation which we trotted through. It was more a form of ritual than a conversation. But then most conversations rehearse the same subjects. When I meet up again with a friend after a couple of months it will be the same stuff, though with some advance in the storyline. In this they are more like soap operas. The same themes and characters reaffirmed to lock you in but with a new segment of evolution. For example: United have had a couple of victories since last time; maybe they’ve turned the corner. Or else, how did it go in the 11+ exam for young Sammy? There are new entries. The three or four conversations all move on by a square in the board game of life: United; kids; work. Who knows? Maybe a new plot line will surface. With my dad we were stuck on the same square.  In the board game it would be where you have to miss a go, or, as far as conversations with my dad were concerned, miss all your go’s. We would be forever stuck on  Bow Street and the Chance card would have said you have neglected to pay your income tax, stay here in Bow Street forever and never throw another dice. That’s tragic, of course, but also comic. We are made to spend our lives at Bow Street. You cannot advance from there, so you have to improvise an elaborate and courtly dance within the perimeter, a weird gavotte. At least you get to explore a new trope. With people who don’t have dementia there are no explorations. It is the same leaden-footed hoofing. People don’t like taking too many risks in their conversation. If you’re lucky you might get on to Vine Street, but there’s not much passing go.

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com

 

April 23: hammer horror

On the tip of your tongue is not the right expression for a memory that just won’t materialise, I find. When I am trying to remember something and strain the brain to get the word to emerge, I don’t sense anything on the tip of my tongue. I sense it in my brain, slowly but inexorably pushing towards my consciousness. I imagine a grey or light brown brain and this smudge pushing itself painfrully out. It’s a little like a particularly recalcitant turd that won’t be rushed. You just have to wait for it to come. Some coffee might coax it out. The obtuse word will materialise the next day when you’re not even looking for it. I wonder if there are acts you can accomplish to hurry a word out. Straining to think hard about it doesn’t help. You start making fruitless leaps of the imagination. You imagine it starts with a certain letter and go cavorting up a barren path.

Today I was trying to remember a French translation I once found for the idea of Hammer horror, that is to say the gruesome world of gothic melodrama. I knew I had once found a nice equivalent for it. Gradually it came to the surface, revealing more and more facettes as it emerged. It was a word somehow connected with marionettes and theatre. I kept worrying at it and it came to me. Grand guignol. That was it. I felt I had willed the word out of the brain. There was no tip of the tongue about it.

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com

April 22: messages from beyond the grave

Some time ago I received an email from an old friend thanking me for some minor thing I had once done. It was a spare email of just one sentence. I was pleased he was getting in touch with me and emailed him back, asking about his news and giving some of mine. He did not reply. I have thought about this. I think it is the equivalent of what alcoholics do when they apologise to everyone as part of their treatment. This must be what you do when you know you are dying; you thank everyone you knew for what they contributed to your life. It may be that there is also a list of people you have to apologise to. A ledger, then: positive and negative. This kind of act would have you dying at ease with your past. I am making all this up but I think it is quite possible. If so, when you draw up your ledger, who would you include and what acts would you judge generous and what pernicious? It could well have been that the little act that I accomplished came across to him as an act of generosity but was, if he had known, in fact motivated by egotism or part of some more complex plot on my part.

Another old friend, meeting up with me after a long period, said: how will I know if you die? I’m not sure about the answer to this one. I suppose, thinking about it now, I could make sure I give someone close to me access to my email account and they could send out a group email. I am not on social media, so that would have to do. I might even write the message myself.

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com

April 18: paragons of virtue

We had to cancel the Mindfulness walk on Hampstead Heath this morning. I must say I wasn’t too fussed. Or rather, I was pretty fussed…about not going. It seems to me once you start doing things in categories you’re getting things wrong. Once you start using the word spirituality, you can be pretty sure you’re going about things in the wrong way. If you are making a separate category for things spiritual, you are probably seeing the rest of your life wrong. I saw a woman with a coat daubed with many virtue words when we were in Tooting and Balham, which was where we ended going. They said things like Just Be Real and Be Kind, exhortations to virtue. Pretty unbearable too, I find. You would expect modern people to be paragons of niceness these days, wouldn’t you? I assure you, they are not.

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com

March 22: capricorn but venus in scorpio

Many years ago I was giving an English Language class to adults in Paris and a woman who had been in the class came up to me at the end of the class and asked my date and time and location of birth. I thought nothing of it. The next week she was back in the class and gave me a cassette. It was my astrological theme analysis. I am Capricorn with Venus in Scorpio. I listened to it at home and, although I obviously did not believe in the objective truth of astrological claims, I found it revealing. The mere fact of having interpretations of my character offered to me caused me to think again. It said I was a difficult character. Was I a difficult character? It had never occurred to me. I thought about it. I looked at my recent experiences. Well, maybe I was.

It is so hard to look at yourself. We tend to do it through the filters of fiction where you follow another character and judge him or her and so, in an oblique kind of way, see yourself. What would I do in those circumstances? Art, of all varieties, is this medium to circumnavigate the self. It also happens when you take stock of material in which you figure; old photos; old letters. When I look at all the pieces I have written in peoplearerubbish, it reacquaints me with my full self, not just the partial synchronic version I am lugging around in the workaday world. Anything that gives you a lens to look at the self is useful, even if the actual material it might offer you is nonsense. As so often, it is the process that you use that creates the illumination; the conclusion they offer you is mostly drivel.

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com

February 7: penis

I popped my nose into the study room/library in the school where I work the other day. It was empty. As I looked around the bookshelves I noticed a sheet of A4 propped up in front of some of the books on a top shelf. I approached it and saw that the word Penis was written large in red biro. I grinned and went up the spiral library ladder to take it down. This was a school for 17 an 18 year-olds, not 13 and 14 year-olds. I would have thought these obsessions would be out of their system by now. I went downstairs into the office to have a little laugh about it. Kerim said yes I saw that. and I said Oh. did you not think to take it down? He said oh well I thought why not? where’s the harm? It is a liberal place.

It got me thinking. Yes, where’s the harm? It’s not obscene. It’s just a bit silly. But it certainly corresponds to an instinct in the teenage boy. Why not? So I started to regret taking the sheet down and throwing it in the bin. The next day I decided to put it back up. I took a similar A4 sheet, wrote the word penis on it in big letters and when the library was empty climbed up the spiral library ladder to put the page back on the topmost shelf. I was just doing this when a little group of 17-year-old girls came into the library and saw me up the ladder putting the word penis up on the top shelf. They did not bat an eyelid.

http://www.peoplearerubbish.com